|
State Laws Regarding Speed Traps
Alabama
| Alaska
| Arizona
| Arkansas
| California
| Colorado | Connecticut | Delaware | Florida | Georgia | Hawaii |
Idaho | Illinois | Indiana | Iowa | Kansas | Kentucky | Louisiana
| Maine | Maryland
| Massachusetts
| Michigan
| Minnesota
| Mississippi
| Missouri
| Montana | Nebraska | Nevada | New Hampshire
| New Jersey
| New Mexico | New York | North Carolina | North Dakota | Ohio | Oklahoma
| Oregon | Pennsylvania | Rhode Island | South Carolina | South Dakota
| Tennessee
| Texas
| Utah | Vermont | Virginia | Washington | West Virginia | Wisconsin
| Wyoming
Section 32-5A-173. When
local authorities may and shall alter maximum limits.
(a) Whenever local authorities in their respective jurisdictions
determine on the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation
that the maximum speed permitted under this article is greater or
less than is reasonable and safe under the conditions found to exist
upon a highway or part of a highway, the local authority may determine
and declare a reasonable and safe maximum limit thereon which:
(1) Decreases the limit at intersections;
(2) Increases the limit within an urban district but not to more
than the maximum rate of speed that may be prescribed by the Governor
under subdivision (6) of Section 32-5A-171;
(3) Decreases the limit on any street, unpaved road, or highway
under the jurisdiction and control of any county commission; or
(4) Increases the limit on any street, unpaved road, or highway
under the jurisdiction and control of any county commission but
not to more than the maximum rate of speed that is prescribed
under subdivision (3) or by the Governor under subdivision (6)
of Section 32-5A-171.
(b) Local authorities in their respective jurisdictions shall determine
by an engineering and traffic investigation the proper maximum speed
for all arterial streets and shall declare a reasonable and safe
maximum limit thereon which may be greater or less than the maximum
speed permitted under this chapter for an urban district.
(c) Any altered limit established as hereinabove authorized shall
be effective at all times or during hours of darkness or at other
times as may be determined when appropriate signs giving notice
thereof are erected upon the street or highway.
(d) Any alteration of maximum limits on state highways or extensions
thereof in a municipality by local authorities shall not be effective
until the alteration has been approved by the Department of Transportation.
(e) Not more than six alterations as hereinabove authorized shall
be made per mile along a street or highway, except in the case of
reduced limits at intersections, and the difference between adjacent
limits shall not be more than 10 miles per hour.
(Acts 1980, No. 80-434, p. 604, §8-104; Acts 1985, 2nd
Ex. Sess., No. 85-998, p. 366, §2; Acts 1994, No. 94-617, p.
1147, §2.)
Section 32-5-1. Powers
of local authorities.
(a) Except as herein otherwise provided, local authorities shall
have no power to pass, enforce or maintain any ordinance, rule or
regulation requiring from any owner or chauffeur or other authorized
driver to whom this chapter is applicable, any additional license
or permit for the use of the public highways, or excluding any such
owner, chauffeur or other authorized driver from the public highway,
nor to pass, enforce or maintain any ordinance, rule or regulation
regulating motor vehicles or their speed contrary to the provisions
of this chapter, nor shall any such law now in force or hereafter
enacted have any effect.
(b) Local authorities shall have no power or authority to charge
a license or tax upon any motor carrier hauling passengers or any
truck hauling freight for hire, when such motor carriers in the
usual course of operations enter or pass through any county, municipality
or town of this state; provided, that this limitation shall not
restrict the right of any municipality to charge a license for the
privilege of maintaining or operating a terminal station, depot
or waiting room therein.
(c) Local authorities may set aside for a given time a specified
public highway for speed contests or races, to be conducted under
proper restrictions for the safety of the public. Local authorities
may exclude motor vehicles from any cemetery or grounds used for
burial of the dead.
(d) Local authorities shall have power to provide by ordinance
for the regulation of traffic by means of traffic officers or semaphores
or other signaling devices on any portion of the highway where traffic
is heavy or continuous and may prohibit other than one-way traffic
upon certain highways and may regulate the use of the highways by
processions or assemblages.
(e) Local authorities may also regulate or prohibit the parking
of vehicles within the limits of their respective municipalities,
and may also regulate the speed of vehicles in public parks and
shall erect at all entrances to such parks adequate signs giving
notice of any such special speed regulations.
(Code 1923, §6269; Acts 1927, No. 347, p. 348; Code 1940,
T. 36, §32.)
Return to Top
Alaska
Alaska has no specific law regarding
Speed Traps. Signs and traffic regulations must conform to MUTCD,
however, communities may request speed limits lower than engineering
studies deem safe and prudent.
Information
provided by NMA member Lawrence D. Wood.
Sec. 19.10.072. Procedures for determination of speed limits
and zones.
(a) In determining safe speed limits and safe speed zones, the
department shall consider the following factors in the order of
priority listed:
(1) neighborhood safety, including the presence of children and
pedestrian traffic;
(2) the presence of schools, houses, parks, and crosswalks;
(3) the presence of driveways, parked vehicles, and multiple turn
locations;
(4) that speed at which safe and prudent drivers could pass through
the speed zone; and
(5) the effectiveness of local enforcement of the speed zone.
(b) In determining safe speed limits and safe speed zones within
a municipality, the department shall consult with that municipality.
In determining safe speed limits and safe speed zones on highways
and other roadways under its jurisdiction, the department shall
also consult with community councils or other community organizations
in the affected area if the community councils or other community
organizations request in writing to participate in the determination.
The department shall provide notice and opportunity for a hearing
before establishing a speed limit or speed zone other than as recommended
by a municipality, community council or other community organization.
Return to Top
Arizona
28-703. Alteration of speed limits by local
authority
A. If a local authority determines on the basis
of an engineering and traffic investigation that the maximum speed
permitted under this article is greater or less than is reasonable
or safe under the conditions found to exist on any part of a street
or highway in its jurisdiction, the local authority may determine
and declare a reasonable and safe maximum speed limit at the location
and, based on the investigation, may:
- Decrease the limit at intersections.
- Increase the limit within any business or residence district
to not more than sixty-five miles per hour.
- Decrease the limit outside any business or residence district.
- Increase or decrease the limit on streets adjacent to school
grounds.
B. A local authority shall determine by an engineering
and traffic investigation the proper maximum speed for all arterial
streets in its jurisdiction and shall declare a reasonable and safe
maximum limit on the arterial streets in its jurisdiction that may
be more or less than the maximum speed permitted under this article
for a business or residence district.
C. A local authority may decrease the limit
to not less than fifteen miles per hour on an unpaved street or
road within any district in its jurisdiction if the local authority
determines that the limit is necessary to achieve or maintain national
ambient air quality standards.
D. An altered limit established as provided
for in this section is effective at all times, or during hours of
darkness, or at other times as may be determined if appropriate
signs giving notice of the altered limit are erected on the street
or highway.
E. The alteration of maximum speed limits on
state highways or extensions of state highways in a municipality
by a local authority is not effective until the director approves
the alteration.
F. A local authority shall not make more than
six alterations per mile along a street or highway pursuant to this
section, except for reduced limits at intersections. The difference
between adjacent limits shall not be more than ten miles per hour
except for school crossings.
Return to Top
Arkansas
12-8-401. Title.
This subchapter may be known as and cited as the ?Arkansas Speed
Trap Law.?
12-8-402. Definitions.
As used in this subchapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
(1) ?Abusing police power? means
the exercise of police power to enforce criminal and traffic laws
for the principal purpose of raising revenue for the municipality
and not for the purpose of public safety and welfare;
(2) ?Affected highway? means a multilane divided highway or limited
access divided highway which is part of the state highway system,
or both; and
(3) ?Affected municipality? means any city of the second class or
incorporated town through which passes an affected highway.
12-8-403. Public hearing to
determine abuse.
(a)(1) Upon the request of
the prosecuting attorney of any judicial district in which an affected
municipality is located, the Director of the Department of Arkansas
State Police is authorized to call a public hearing to investigate
and determine whether any municipality is abusing police power.
(2)(A) The hearing shall be
conducted at a public meeting at the county courthouse in the county
where the affected municipality is located.
(B) Notice of the time
and place of the public meeting shall be published in a newspaper
having general circulation in the county for two (2) consecutive
weeks, the last publication being not more than ten (10) days prior
to the meeting.
(b) It shall be presumed that the
affected municipality is abusing police power upon a finding that:
(1) The amount of revenue produced by fines
and costs from traffic law violations for which citations were written
by the police department of the affected municipality occurring
on the affected highways exceeds thirty percent (30%) of the affected
municipality's total expenditures, less capital expenditures and
debt service, in the preceding year; or
(2) More than fifty percent (50%) of the
summons written for speeding in the affected municipality are written
for speed limit violations which were ten miles per hour (10 m.p.h.)
or less than the posted limit.
12-8-404. Sanctions.
(a) Upon a determination that the
municipality is abusing police power, the Director of the Department
of Arkansas State Police shall have the power to issue the following
sanctions:
(1) Order that a municipality abusing police
power shall cease patrolling any or all affected highways; and
(2) Order that all or any part of future
fines and court costs received from traffic law violations or misdemeanor
cases where the location of the offense is an affected highway shall
be paid over to the county general fund of the county in which the
municipality is located.
(b) Any violation of the sanction ordered under subdivision (a)(1)
of this section by any police officer shall constitute a Class A
misdemeanor for each citation, summons, or misdemeanor arrest made
in violation of the director's order.
Return to Top
California
CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE SECTION:
40801. No peace officer or other
person shall use a speed trap in arresting, or participating
or assisting in the arrest of, any person for any alleged violation
of this code nor shall any speed trap be used in securing evidence
as to the speed of any vehicle for the purpose of an arrest or prosecution
under this code.
40802. (a) A speed trap
is either of the following:
(1) A particular section of a highway
measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated,
or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may
be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel
the known distance.
(2) A particular section of a highway
with a prima facie speed limit that is provided by this code or
by local ordinance under subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 22352, or established under Section 22354, 22357,
22358, or 22358.3, if that prima facie speed limit is not justified
by an engineering and traffic survey conducted within five years
prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement of the
speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device
that measures the speed of moving objects. This paragraph does not
apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
(b)
(1) For purposes of this section,
a local street or road is defined by the latest functional usage
and federal-aid system maps submitted to the federal Highway Administration,
except that when these maps have not been submitted, or when the
street or road is not
shown on the maps, a "local street or road" means a street
or road that primarily provides access to abutting residential property
and meets the following three conditions:
(A) Roadway width of not more than
40 feet.
(B) Not more than one-half of a
mile of uninterrupted length. Interruptions shall include official
traffic control devices as defined in Section 445.
(C) Not more than one traffic lane
in each direction.
(2) For purposes of this section
"School zone" means that area of
road contiguous to a school building or the grounds thereof, and
on
which is posted a standard "SCHOOL" warning sign, while
children are
going to or leaving the school either during school hours or during
the noon recess period.
(c)
(1) When all the following criteria
are met, paragraph (2) of this subdivision shall be applicable and
subdivision (a) shall not be applicable:
(A) When radar is used, the officer
issuing the citation has successfully completed a radar operator
course of not less than 24 hours on the use of police traffic
radar, and the course was approved and certified by the Commission
on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(B) When laser or any other electronic
device is used to measure the speed of moving objects, the officer
issuing the notice to appear has successfully completed the training
required in subparagraph (A) and an additional training course
of not less than two hours approved and certified by the Commission
on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
(C)
(i) The prosecution proved that
the officer complied with subparagraphs (A) and (B) and that
an engineering and traffic survey has been conducted in accordance
with subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2). The prosecution proved
that, prior to the officer issuing the notice to appear, the
officer established that the radar, laser, or other electronic
device conformed to the requirements of subparagraph (D).
(ii) The prosecution proved the
speed of the accused was unsafe for the conditions present at
the time of alleged violation unless the citation was for a
violation of Section 22349, 22356, or 22406.
(D) The radar, laser, or other
electronic device used to measure the speed of the accused meets
or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic
Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within
the three years prior to the date of the alleged violation by
an independent certified laser or radar repair and testing or
calibration facility.
(2) A "speed trap"
is either of the following:
(A) A particular section of a highway
measured as to distance and with boundaries marked, designated,
or otherwise determined in order that the speed of a vehicle may
be calculated by securing the time it takes the vehicle to travel
the known distance.
(B)
(i) A particular section of a
highway or state highway with a prima facie speed limit that
is provided by this code or by local ordinance under subparagraph
(A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 22352, or
established under Section 22354, 22357, 22358, or 22358.3, if
that prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering
and traffic survey conducted within one of the following time
periods, prior to the date of the alleged violation, and enforcement
of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic
device that measures the speed of moving objects:
(I) Except as specified in
subclause (II), seven years.
(II) If an engineering and traffic survey was conducted more
than seven years prior to the date of the alleged violation,
and a registered engineer evaluates the section of the highway
and determines that no significant changes in roadway or traffic
conditions have occurred, including, but not limited to, changes
in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic
volume, 10 years.
(ii) This subparagraph does not
apply to a local street, road, or school zone.
40803. (a) No evidence as to the speed of a vehicle upon a
highway shall be admitted in any court upon the trial of any person
in any prosecution under this code upon a charge involving the speed
of a vehicle when the evidence is based upon or obtained from or by
the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) In any prosecution under this code
of a charge involving the speed of a vehicle, where enforcement involves
the use of radar or other electronic devices which measure the speed
of moving objects, the prosecution shall establish, as part of its
prima facie case, that the evidence or testimony presented is not
based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 40802.
(c) When a traffic and engineering
survey is required pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of
Section 40802, evidence that a traffic and engineering survey has
been conducted within five years of the date of the alleged violation
or evidence that the offense was committed on a local street or road
as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 40802 shall
constitute a prima facie case that the evidence or testimony is not
based upon a speed trap as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision
(a) of Section 40802.
40804. (a) In any prosecution under this code upon a charge
involving the speed of a vehicle, any officer or other person shall
be incompetent as a witness if the testimony is based upon or obtained
from or by the maintenance or use of a speed trap.
(b) Every officer arresting, or participating
or assisting in the arrest of, a person so charged while on duty for
the exclusive or main purpose of enforcing the provisions of Divisions
10 and 11 is incompetent as a witness if at the time of such arrest
he was not wearing a distinctive uniform, or was using a motor vehicle
not painted the distinctive color specified by the commissioner. This
section does not apply to an officer assigned exclusively to the duty
of investigating and securing evidence in reference to any theft of
a vehicle or failure of a person to stop in the event of an accident
or violation of Section 23109 or in reference to any felony charge
or to any officer engaged in serving any warrant when the officer
is not engaged in patrolling the highways for the purpose of enforcing
the traffic laws.
40805. Every court shall be
without jurisdiction to render a judgment of conviction against any
person for a violation of this code involving the speed of a vehicle
if the court admits any evidence or testimony secured in violation
of, or which is inadmissible under this article.
Return to Top
Massachusetts
I don't think we have any specific laws against speed traps or ticket
quotas: the legislature doesn't think there is a problem and doesn't
want to offend the police.
However, here is a useful provision of Massachusetts
law. I think it's a legacy from the 1940s that every other state has
since abandoned.
An instantaneous speed measurement is not sufficient
for a speeding conviction when no speed limit is posted. If there
is no posted limit, one must exceed the 30 MPH for 1/8 mile in a "thickly
settled or business district", or exceed 40 or 50 for 1/4 mile
elsewhere, to be considered speeding.
Information provided
by NMA member John Carr.
Return to Top
Michigan
Michigan has no specific anti-speed-trap law. What it does have is
a law (Michigan Compiled Law 257.909) that directs fines for violation
of the STATE Motor Vehicle Code to ". . . be exclusively applied
to the support of public libraries and county law libraries . . ."
This was done to deny State Police and other police a cut of traffic
fines. But it only applies to violations of the STATE code.
Fines for violations of municipal ordinances go
to the city and the courts, with the usual expected abuses. Further,
the cities have discovered that if they adopt local versions of other
than the usual traffic laws, they get to keep those fines, too, so
more and more cities have ordinances against driving without a license
plate, or truck-safety-equipment ordinances. The truck fines are especially
huge.
Information provided
by NMA member Aarne H. Frebom
Return to Top
Minnesota
Minnesota has no specific anti-speed-trap law.
Return to Top
Missouri
302.341. Moving traffic
violation, failure to prepay fine or appear in court, license suspended,
procedure ? reinstatement when ? excessive revenue from fines to be
distributed to schools.
. . . If any city, town or village
receives more than forty-five percent of its total annual revenue
from fines for traffic violations occurring on state highways, all
revenues from such violations in excess of forty-five percent of the
total annual revenue of the city, town or village shall be sent to
the director of the department of revenue and shall be distributed
annually to the schools of the county in the same manner that proceeds
of all penalties, forfeitures and fines collected for any breach of
the penal laws of the state are distributed.
4.010.Definitions
4. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 304.120 or any other
provision of law to the contrary, cities, towns and villages may regulate
the speed of vehicles on state roads and highways within such cities?,
towns? or villages? corporate limits by ordinance with the approval
of the state highways and transportation commission. Any reduction
of speed in cities, towns or villages shall be designed to expedite
the flow of traffic on such state roads and highways to the extend
consistent with public safety. The commission may declare
any ordinance void if it finds that such ordinance is:
(1) Not primarily designed to expedite
traffic flow; and
(2) Primarily designed to produce revenue for the city, town
or village which enacted such ordinance.
If an ordinance is declared void, the
city, town or village shall have any future proposed ordinance approved
by the highways and transportation commission before such ordinance
may take effect.
Return to Top
New
Jersey
There are no anti-speed trap laws in NJ. The State Police have a policy
not to set up within a mile of a speed zone change (typically our
65/55 highways).
Information provided
by NJ State Coordinator Steve Carellas
Return to Top
Texas
TRC 542-402. Disposition of Fines
(b) In each fiscal year, a municipality
having a population of less than 5,000 may retain, from fines collected
for violations of highway laws in this subtitle and from special expenses
collected under Article 45.54, Code of Criminal Procedure, in cases
in which a violation of this subtitle is alleged, an amount equal
to 30 percent of the municipality's revenue for the preceding fiscal
year from all sources, other than federal funds and bond proceeds,
as shown by the audit performed under Section 103.001, Local Government
Code. After a municipality has retained that amount, the municipality
shall send to the comptroller any portion of a fine or a special expense
collected that exceeds $1.
(c) The comptroller shall enforce Subsection
(b).
(d) In a fiscal year in which a municipality
retains from fines and special expenses collected for violations of
highway laws in this subtitle an amount equal to at least 20 percent
of the municipality's revenue for the preceding fiscal year from all
sources other than federal funds and bond proceeds, not later than
the 120th day after the last day of the municipality's fiscal year,
the municipality shall send to the comptroller:
(1) a copy of the municipality's
financial statement for that fiscal year filed under Chapter 103,
Local Government Code; and
(2) a report that shows the total amount collected for that fiscal
year from fines and special expenses under subsection (b).
(e) If an audit is conducted by the
comptroller under Subsection (c) and it is determined that the municipality
is retaining more than 20 percent of the amounts under subsection
(b) and has not complied with Subsection
(d), the municipality shall pay the costs incurred by the comptroller
in conducting the audit.
Return to Top
|
|